wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx moved upon the face of the 'Net and spake thusly:
> I think you're being unreasonable Chris:
>
> > My wife and the Neigbourhood Witch (I'm not kidding) tried the web
> > baby-sex tests.
> > According to the ultrasound, both the witch and web sites were dead
> > wrong.
>
> The e-mail message only claimed 92% reliability, maybe you're in the
> other 8%. How can you be sure the ultrasound is correct ?
You can't.
About 8 months ago, a close friend of ours whose ultrasound result was
"Girl" ("with 97 onfidence") gave birth to a lovely little boy.
So we're not painting any walls just yet.
> > Oh, BTW, did I mention we're going to have a baby? :-)
>
> BTW, congratulations !
>
Thanks...
We've just ticked over half-way, so I've got four months to decide
what gear to take to the hospital (not into the delivery room, mind
you, I'm not that kind of nutter).
--cjb
--
It's boring being a program when your only job is inserting a random .sig.
Muggins thinks I've put his .sig here, won't he be surprised...
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|