On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:52:54 -0800, Jan Steinman <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
> Plus your neg speed was faster, so things aren't very equal. Provia is
> known for fine grain, but I'm not familiar with NPS.
>
> The only time I prefer neg film -- especially if the destination is
> scanning -- is in very high contrast situations, where the greater
> latitude of the film is more important than the RMS grain frequency.
NPS is ISO160, but I tend to rate it 125. It is also very mute, low
contrast, low saturation for wedding work, whereas provia is quite a bit
more punchier. that might be something to account for part of the
difference.
--
/S
aim:iddibhai
icq:104079359
email/msn:msidd004atstudentdotucrdotedu
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|