Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: CF longevity, was: Re: Film vs. Analog - interesting read

Subject: [OM] Re: CF longevity, was: Re: Film vs. Analog - interesting read
From: keith_w <keith_w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:31:47 -0700
Tim Hughes wrote:
> I seem to remember reading the normal memory chips suffer from ionizing 
> radiation hits, (because
> the number of electrons stored has got to be so small), but they now 
> encapsulate/cover the chip
> surface to minimise the effect. 
> 
> tim Hughes

What are they going to cover the chip with that will stop cosmic or gamma rays 
from zinging right on thru?

keith whaley

>> that too.  But I do not know if those bits will eventually fade off into 
>> the void sitting in the closet or if they're subject to flipping from 
>> cosmic rays.
>>
>> I do know that cosmic rays were a worry to at least one of IBM's memory 
>> engineers when chip density hit 64K bits about 30 years ago.  But that 
>> problem was obviouly solved or else maybe didn't exist in the first place.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz