Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM-4T also Ti ?

Subject: [OM] Re: OM-4T also Ti ?
From: hiwayman@xxxxxxx (Walt Wayman)
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 17:43:47 +0000
Just to add a bit of redundancy to the thread, I've got three: one black 4Ti, 
one champagne 4Ti, and one black T. There's not a bit of difference, except the 
black T is missing a little white i.

I've also got three plain 4s. Except for the inability to sync with the F280 
flash at fast shutter speeds, they're as good as the Ts. And, if I might borrow 
something Chuck said on another subject, the F280 IMO is about as useful as 
tits on a boar hog. The titanium top and bottom might be an advantage if you 
plan to drive nails or are really, really clumsy, but otherwise, it's mostly a 
gimmick intended to attract techno geeks.

Walt

--
"Anything more than 500 yards from 
the car just isn't photogenic." -- 
Edward Weston

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ps:  If you really want an OM-4T or OM-4Ti you can probably get a good 
> deal right here.  Just ask.  You can probably get an even better deal on 
> an OM-4 some of which may even have the OM-4T circuit board installed. 
> An OM-4T circuit board in an OM-4 improves battery life but does not 
> enable support for the F280 full-synchro flash.  This is either really 
> bad news or "sorry, I don't care".  The improved battery life may save 
> you a few bucks a year provided you use silver oxide batteries as you 
> should.  It will save you an order of magnitude more than that if you 
> are silly enough to try using alkaline batteries in an OM-2s or OM-4.
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> Russ Butler wrote:
> 
> > I'd like to get a 4Ti someday & came across this:
> > 
> > 120040904241        
> > 
> > Title is "Olympus OM-4 T Titanium Camera Body OM4T OM-4 NR 153993"
> > 
> > Seller's text says:
> > "T means that this is Olympus' Titanium version of their OM-4, more 
> > durable that other models."
> > 
> > I think this is BS, but I don't know much, & the link at 
> > http://olympus.dementia.org/eSIF/om-sif/bodygroup.htm,
> > i.e. .  "1987-      OM-4Ti (OM-4T)"
> > that points to http://olympus.dementia.org/eSIF/om-sif/bodygroup/om4ti.htm
> > confuses me.
> > 
> > T=Ti True or BS?
> > 
> > 
> > TIA
> > 
> > 
==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz