Subject: | [OM] Re: E-410 vs E-510 and IS? |
---|---|
From: | "Jeff Keller" <jeffreyrkeller@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:10:45 -0700 |
Thanks that's interesting ... Trying to dig further turned up a reference to a piezo electric motion detector and said it was refered to as a gyro detector (I always thought a gyro detector had a spinning wheel not a mass connected to a piezo electric crystal). I found a comparison of results at http://www.neocamera.com/feature_stabilization_shootout.html Canon provides a nice explanation <http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/controller?act=GetArticleAct&articleID=706&fromTips=1> Panasonic is vague but might be implying they use both a piezo electric motion sensor and an image processor examining the CCD? http://www.panasonic-hk.com/av/english/dc/background.asp -jeff On 6/19/07, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The K10D does correct for rotation about the lens axis which I thought > was pretty cool. That's something that I don't think you could do with > in-lens IS. > > Chuck Norcutt > > Jeff Keller wrote: > > > > > Also suggests that an earlier speculation about the body being able to > > correct for rotation about the lens axis is probably possible but not > > likely. It would require another motion detector. > > -jeff > > > > ============================================== > List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com > List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx > ============================================== > ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: E-410 vs E-510 and IS?, Larry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Contrast (OT, sorta), Sandy Harris |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-410 vs E-510 and IS?, Larry |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: E-410 vs E-510 and IS?, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |