| Subject: | [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad |
|---|---|
| From: | Dan Mitchell <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:31:42 -0600 |
Chris Crawford wrote: > The 1.4 I had was very sharp > and yours seems to be too....what aperture did you shoot at? Those were at 1.4, yup; s/n on this lens is 408,000ish. -- dan ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad, Chris Crawford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad, Chris Crawford |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad, Chris Crawford |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Sometimes, the 'bad' lenses aren't so bad, Chris Crawford |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |