Moose:
Sorry, a bit too cryptic on my part. 'WR' is short for weather resistant.
In terms of focal lengths, my gap is also between the 12-50 (which is
not as sharp as it could be at the long end) and the 75-300 (which is a
bit slow at the short end). In particular situations, I end up wanting
either a bit longer, or a bit shorter FL. It's cumbersome to be changing
lenses.
Martin
On 2017-02-22 4:51 PM, Moose wrote:
I also recognize that the 2.8 zooms may be marginal for these same
dim/dark/night conditions, compared to primes. However, at the
moment, they or the 12-100 are really the only way to go for WR lenses
Ya got me with QR. Working Reality? Widely Restricted? Holey Volley?
What a Ride!
Martin
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|